
Former Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn questions the synergy of a potential merger as automakers seek to navigate EV challenges and global competition.
Speculation surrounding a potential merger between Japanese automotive giants Nissan and Honda has sparked a flurry of discussion in the industry. Reports from Japanese media suggest that the companies are in early talks to unite their operations—a bold strategy aimed at consolidating resources to strengthen their position in the rapidly expanding electric vehicle (EV) market. However, the proposal has drawn criticism, notably from Nissan’s former CEO Carlos Ghosn, who has labeled the move as “desperate.”
Should the merger materialize, the combined entity would become the world’s third-largest carmaker by volume, aligning Japan’s second and third-largest automakers. Such a move could have far-reaching implications for both companies and the global auto industry. Yet, Nissan and Honda have tempered expectations, stating they are merely exploring “various possibilities for future collaboration” with no definitive decisions reached.
Despite its potential scale, Ghosn remains skeptical of the merger’s viability, citing a lack of complementary strengths between the two companies. “The two companies share very similar markets and products, leaving little room for complementarity,” Ghosn stated. He suggested the talks might be influenced by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, which could be seeking to align Nissan’s immediate challenges with Honda’s long-term vision.
Nissan’s precarious financial position underscores the urgency behind the merger discussions. The automaker has faced a 20.7% decline in its stock price this year and recently announced global job cuts affecting 9,000 positions. Once an EV trailblazer with the 2010 release of the Leaf—the world’s first mass-market electric car—Nissan has since lost its competitive edge. The company’s product portfolio lacks hybrid and plug-in options in critical markets like the U.S., falling behind rivals such as Tesla and Chinese EV manufacturers.
Chinese automakers, in particular, have emerged as formidable competitors, dominating key markets such as Southeast Asia and Latin America. According to ABI Research, Chinese EV makers accounted for 70% of Thailand’s EV market and 88% of Brazil’s in the first quarter of this year.
Andy Palmer, Nissan’s former COO, has attributed the company’s struggles to poor management, citing a lack of depth and competitiveness in its product lineup.
Honda, known for its meticulous planning and long-term vision, presents a stark contrast to Nissan’s immediate challenges. However, Ghosn questions whether the automakers’ overlapping markets and product strategies can generate meaningful synergy.
“The timing of this merger suggests a state of panic within Nissan,” Ghosn remarked, pointing to its declining profits and escalating competition.
The potential merger also highlights broader challenges within the Japanese automotive sector. Once seen as the pinnacle of efficiency and innovation, Japanese automakers now face increasing pressure to adapt to the electrification wave sweeping the industry.
Ghosn, who led Nissan during its early EV successes, has his own tumultuous history with the company. Arrested in 2018 on charges of financial misconduct, he spent over 100 days in detention before fleeing to Lebanon in a dramatic escape. Ghosn has since maintained his innocence and recently filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Nissan, claiming reputational and financial damage.
As Nissan grapples with falling sales and intensifying competition, a merger with Honda represents both a significant opportunity and a considerable risk. While it could provide a pathway to shared resources and innovation, the lack of clear complementarity raises questions about its effectiveness in addressing Nissan’s core challenges.
The automotive world will watch closely to see whether this potential partnership will steer Nissan and Honda toward a brighter future—or deepen the challenges they face in an increasingly electrified and competitive market.


